K-2021-08-04-all-icsd

The current structure dataset comprises 14924 structures generated from unique ICSD prototype structures composed of single elements with zero oxidation state. A more detailed procedure is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019). The procedure to estimate interatomic potentials from the dataset is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019) and Phys. Rev. B 102, 174104 (2020).

Improvement from **-dataset-10000-all-icsd

• More robust for structures with a small interatomic distance

• More robust for structures with a large interatomic distance

• More complex potential models are included.

• MLPs are estimated without using DFT stress tensors.

• MLPs are estimated by using small regression weights for energetically unstable structures.

Predictions using Pareto optimal MLPs

The cohesive energy and volume are obtained by performing a local structure optimization from the DFT equilibrium structure. In addition, the DFT equilibrium structure is obtained by optimizing a prototype structure included in ICSD, and the prototype is used as the structure legend in the figure. Therefore, the structure type of the converged structure is sometimes different from that shown in the legend even if the potential energy surface predicted by MLP is almost the same as the true one.

The other properties predicted by each Pareto optimal MLP are available from column Predictions in the following table.

Pareto optimals

Name	Time [ms] (1core/36cores)	RMSE [meV/atom]/[eV/A]	Predictions	Files
pair-1	0.012 / 0.003	110.34 / 0.1197	–	–
pair-14	0.017 / 0.038	69.221 / 0.0716	–	–
pair-27	0.018 / 0.005	52.957 / 0.0807	–	–
pair-15	0.026 / 0.039	26.550 / 0.0529	–	–
pair-28	0.027 / 0.007	12.930 / 0.0389	–	–
pair-16	0.039 / 0.040	9.4656 / 0.0161	–	–
pair-29	0.039 / 0.009	5.9117 / 0.0118	–	–
pair-17	0.051 / 0.042	5.8915 / 0.0135	–	–
pair-32	0.051 / 0.010	3.5431 / 0.0098	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
pair-30	0.053 / 0.011	2.1373 / 0.0089	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
pair-33	0.069 / 0.012	2.0109 / 0.0065	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
pair-34	0.096 / 0.016	1.5699 / 0.0063	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
pair-37	0.136 / 0.018	1.4946 / 0.0062	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
pair-38	0.171 / 0.022	1.4633 / 0.0057	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
pair-39	0.229 / 0.030	1.3928 / 0.0054	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-250	0.716 / 0.056	0.9734 / 0.0038	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-318	0.906 / 0.068	0.7502 / 0.0028	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-265	0.983 / 0.070	0.7322 / 0.0028	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-321	1.240 / 0.088	0.6172 / 0.0028	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-205	1.307 / 0.088	0.6124 / 0.0027	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-270	1.323 / 0.091	0.6011 / 0.0027	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-330	1.834 / 0.118	0.5678 / 0.0022	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-220	1.890 / 0.117	0.5582 / 0.0022	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-285	2.031 / 0.123	0.5395 / 0.0022	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-348	2.068 / 0.102	0.5360 / 0.0022	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-225	2.394 / 0.148	0.4954 / 0.0020	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-290	2.494 / 0.149	0.4813 / 0.0020	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-295	3.164 / 0.186	0.4653 / 0.0019	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-325	4.984 / 0.282	0.4586 / 0.0021	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-211	5.026 / 0.276	0.4559 / 0.0021	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-276	5.481 / 0.309	0.4509 / 0.0021	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-212	5.696 / 0.300	0.4438 / 0.0021	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-277	5.863 / 0.307	0.4383 / 0.0021	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-222	6.837 / 0.369	0.4371 / 0.0019	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-287	6.946 / 0.371	0.4255 / 0.0019	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-334	7.551 / 0.408	0.4007 / 0.0019	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-226	7.611 / 0.398	0.3963 / 0.0018	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-291	7.688 / 0.412	0.3862 / 0.0018	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-227	8.349 / 0.454	0.3815 / 0.0018	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-292	8.473 / 0.461	0.3728 / 0.0018	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-296	9.822 / 0.510	0.3450 / 0.0017	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-232	10.649 / 0.547	0.3399 / 0.0017	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-297	10.655 / 0.543	0.3326 / 0.0017	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-233	21.512 / 1.002	0.3319 / 0.0017	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-298	21.560 / 1.090	0.3256 / 0.0016	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-234	21.888 / 1.017	0.3204 / 0.0016	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-299	22.419 / 1.031	0.3148 / 0.0016	predictions	mlp.lammps input log

Column “Time” shows the time required to compute the energy and forces for 1 MD step and 1 atom, which is estimated from a simulation of 10 runs for a structure with 284 atoms using a workstation with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz. Note that the MLPs should be carefully used for extreme structures. The MLPs often return meaningless values for them.

• All Pareto optimal MLPs are available here.