Nb-2021-08-25-all-icsd

The current structure dataset comprises 10882 structures generated from unique ICSD prototype structures composed of single elements with zero oxidation state. A more detailed procedure is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019). The procedure to estimate interatomic potentials from the dataset is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019) and Phys. Rev. B 102, 174104 (2020).

Improvement from **-dataset-10000-all-icsd

• More robust for structures with a small interatomic distance

• More robust for structures with a large interatomic distance

• More complex potential models are included.

• MLPs are estimated without using DFT stress tensors.

• MLPs are estimated by using small regression weights for energetically unstable structures.

Predictions using Pareto optimal MLPs

The cohesive energy and volume are obtained by performing a local structure optimization from the DFT equilibrium structure. In addition, the DFT equilibrium structure is obtained by optimizing a prototype structure included in ICSD, and the prototype is used as the structure legend in the figure. Therefore, the structure type of the converged structure is sometimes different from that shown in the legend even if the potential energy surface predicted by MLP is almost the same as the true one.

The other properties predicted by each Pareto optimal MLP are available from column Predictions in the following table.

Nb-2021-08-25-all-icsd shows large prediction errors. They should be carefully used. Such an MLP is often accurate for reasonable structures, but it is not accurate for unrealistic structures.

Pareto optimals

Name	Time [ms] (1core/36cores)	RMSE [meV/atom]/[eV/A]	Predictions	Files
pair-1	0.012 / 0.003	197.87 / 0.5536	–	–
pair-14	0.017 / 0.038	49.871 / 0.3165	–	–
pair-27	0.018 / 0.005	38.940 / 0.3039	–	–
pair-28	0.027 / 0.007	37.473 / 0.3033	–	–
pair-31	0.050 / 0.007	31.111 / 0.2918	–	–
pair-24	0.132 / 0.019	29.989 / 0.3007	–	–
pair-37	0.136 / 0.018	23.141 / 0.2800	–	–
pair-38	0.171 / 0.022	22.214 / 0.2791	–	–
gtinv-300	0.228 / 0.023	17.459 / 0.1970	–	–
gtinv-235	0.281 / 0.023	16.404 / 0.1847	–	–
gtinv-175	0.376 / 0.031	15.398 / 0.1877	–	–
gtinv-312	0.472 / 0.036	11.485 / 0.1790	–	–
gtinv-190	0.523 / 0.038	10.600 / 0.1692	–	–
gtinv-301	0.743 / 0.062	7.6981 / 0.1556	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-236	0.804 / 0.059	7.2387 / 0.1505	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-171	0.818 / 0.060	7.1194 / 0.1510	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-172	1.152 / 0.075	5.7498 / 0.1339	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-313	1.590 / 0.102	5.6716 / 0.1451	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-191	1.600 / 0.102	5.4547 / 0.1413	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-174	1.973 / 0.134	4.8226 / 0.1283	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-192	2.106 / 0.124	4.5197 / 0.1261	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-257	2.164 / 0.129	4.5095 / 0.1253	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-194	3.908 / 0.240	4.2593 / 0.1234	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-259	4.078 / 0.244	4.2486 / 0.1225	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-264	5.489 / 0.315	3.9129 / 0.1216	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-222	6.837 / 0.369	3.8508 / 0.1223	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-287	6.946 / 0.371	3.8294 / 0.1216	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-224	14.066 / 0.687	3.7040 / 0.1191	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-289	14.825 / 0.712	3.6701 / 0.1185	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-294	17.107 / 0.825	3.6172 / 0.1178	predictions	mlp.lammps input log

Column “Time” shows the time required to compute the energy and forces for 1 MD step and 1 atom, which is estimated from a simulation of 10 runs for a structure with 284 atoms using a workstation with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz. Note that the MLPs should be carefully used for extreme structures. The MLPs often return meaningless values for them.

• All Pareto optimal MLPs are available here.