Te-2021-09-03-all-icsd

The current structure dataset comprises 25863 structures generated from unique ICSD prototype structures composed of single elements with zero oxidation state. A more detailed procedure is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019). The procedure to estimate interatomic potentials from the dataset is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019) and Phys. Rev. B 102, 174104 (2020).

Improvement from **-dataset-10000-all-icsd

• More robust for structures with a small interatomic distance

• More robust for structures with a large interatomic distance

• More complex potential models are included.

• MLPs are estimated without using DFT stress tensors.

• MLPs are estimated by using small regression weights for energetically unstable structures.

Predictions using Pareto optimal MLPs

The cohesive energy and volume are obtained by performing a local structure optimization from the DFT equilibrium structure. In addition, the DFT equilibrium structure is obtained by optimizing a prototype structure included in ICSD, and the prototype is used as the structure legend in the figure. Therefore, the structure type of the converged structure is sometimes different from that shown in the legend even if the potential energy surface predicted by MLP is almost the same as the true one.

The other properties predicted by each Pareto optimal MLP are available from column Predictions in the following table.

Te-2021-09-03-all-icsd shows large prediction errors. They should be carefully used. Such an MLP is often accurate for reasonable structures, but it is not accurate for unrealistic structures.

Pareto optimals

Name	Time [ms] (1core/36cores)	RMSE [meV/atom]/[eV/A]	Predictions	Files
gtinv-110	0.362 / 0.030	26.651 / 0.1721	–	–
gtinv-125	0.537 / 0.037	23.408 / 0.1616	–	–
gtinv-250	0.716 / 0.056	17.163 / 0.1485	–	–
gtinv-265	0.983 / 0.070	11.954 / 0.1292	–	–
gtinv-330	1.834 / 0.118	10.212 / 0.1220	–	–
gtinv-220	1.890 / 0.117	9.4668 / 0.1180	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-285	2.031 / 0.123	9.4190 / 0.1173	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-261	2.341 / 0.142	8.6437 / 0.1160	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-262	2.839 / 0.166	8.2339 / 0.1120	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-343	2.986 / 0.131	8.1648 / 0.1062	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-267	3.516 / 0.196	8.1088 / 0.1109	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-357	3.742 / 0.166	7.8741 / 0.1039	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-360	4.081 / 0.224	7.7463 / 0.1047	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-344	4.588 / 0.248	7.5162 / 0.1027	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-264	5.489 / 0.315	7.3235 / 0.1061	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-347	5.540 / 0.290	6.7368 / 0.1022	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-232	10.649 / 0.547	6.6803 / 0.1018	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-223	13.159 / 0.653	6.5449 / 0.0983	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-288	13.824 / 0.659	6.5292 / 0.0980	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-224	14.066 / 0.687	6.2395 / 0.0962	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-289	14.825 / 0.712	6.2311 / 0.0960	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-228	16.624 / 0.807	6.1489 / 0.0973	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-294	17.107 / 0.825	6.0463 / 0.0954	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-229	17.857 / 0.829	6.0349 / 0.0955	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-234	21.888 / 1.017	6.0133 / 0.0958	predictions	mlp.lammps input log

Column “Time” shows the time required to compute the energy and forces for 1 MD step and 1 atom, which is estimated from a simulation of 10 runs for a structure with 284 atoms using a workstation with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz. Note that the MLPs should be carefully used for extreme structures. The MLPs often return meaningless values for them.

• All Pareto optimal MLPs are available here.