Zr-2021-08-25-all-icsd

The current structure dataset comprises 10939 structures generated from unique ICSD prototype structures composed of single elements with zero oxidation state. A more detailed procedure is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019). The procedure to estimate interatomic potentials from the dataset is found in Phys. Rev. B 99, 214108 (2019) and Phys. Rev. B 102, 174104 (2020).

Improvement from **-dataset-10000-all-icsd

• More robust for structures with a small interatomic distance

• More robust for structures with a large interatomic distance

• More complex potential models are included.

• MLPs are estimated without using DFT stress tensors.

• MLPs are estimated by using small regression weights for energetically unstable structures.

Predictions using Pareto optimal MLPs

The cohesive energy and volume are obtained by performing a local structure optimization from the DFT equilibrium structure. In addition, the DFT equilibrium structure is obtained by optimizing a prototype structure included in ICSD, and the prototype is used as the structure legend in the figure. Therefore, the structure type of the converged structure is sometimes different from that shown in the legend even if the potential energy surface predicted by MLP is almost the same as the true one.

The other properties predicted by each Pareto optimal MLP are available from column Predictions in the following table.

Zr-2021-08-25-all-icsd shows large prediction errors. They should be carefully used. Such an MLP is often accurate for reasonable structures, but it is not accurate for unrealistic structures.

Pareto optimals

Name	Time [ms] (1core/36cores)	RMSE [meV/atom]/[eV/A]	Predictions	Files
pair-1	0.012 / 0.003	285.03 / 0.5685	–	–
pair-14	0.017 / 0.038	40.799 / 0.2492	–	–
pair-27	0.018 / 0.005	32.560 / 0.2380	–	–
pair-28	0.027 / 0.007	30.426 / 0.2380	–	–
pair-31	0.050 / 0.007	26.878 / 0.2277	–	–
pair-32	0.051 / 0.010	24.732 / 0.2245	–	–
pair-33	0.069 / 0.012	24.337 / 0.2214	–	–
pair-34	0.096 / 0.016	23.310 / 0.2233	–	–
pair-37	0.136 / 0.018	19.122 / 0.2130	–	–
pair-38	0.171 / 0.022	18.178 / 0.2122	–	–
gtinv-300	0.228 / 0.023	10.685 / 0.1424	–	–
gtinv-235	0.281 / 0.023	8.9220 / 0.1346	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-312	0.472 / 0.036	7.1909 / 0.1323	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-190	0.523 / 0.038	6.4526 / 0.1260	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-255	0.573 / 0.040	6.4455 / 0.1256	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-236	0.804 / 0.059	6.2715 / 0.1193	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-171	0.818 / 0.060	6.2481 / 0.1199	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-176	1.108 / 0.075	6.0470 / 0.1234	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-172	1.152 / 0.075	5.2662 / 0.1090	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-237	1.177 / 0.073	5.2434 / 0.1083	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-177	1.475 / 0.092	4.7998 / 0.1114	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-242	1.506 / 0.092	4.7655 / 0.1111	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-174	1.973 / 0.134	4.6571 / 0.1051	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-239	2.057 / 0.133	4.6427 / 0.1046	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-192	2.106 / 0.124	4.1135 / 0.1033	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-257	2.164 / 0.129	4.0582 / 0.1026	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-197	2.819 / 0.158	3.8612 / 0.1042	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-262	2.839 / 0.166	3.8607 / 0.1037	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-194	3.908 / 0.240	3.5638 / 0.0997	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-259	4.078 / 0.244	3.5380 / 0.0993	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-264	5.489 / 0.315	3.4236 / 0.0996	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-199	5.828 / 0.316	3.4201 / 0.1001	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-222	6.837 / 0.369	3.3897 / 0.0997	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-287	6.946 / 0.371	3.3533 / 0.0991	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-224	14.066 / 0.687	3.2511 / 0.0969	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-289	14.825 / 0.712	3.2084 / 0.0964	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-234	21.888 / 1.017	3.1176 / 0.0989	predictions	mlp.lammps input log
gtinv-299	22.419 / 1.031	3.1054 / 0.0985	predictions	mlp.lammps input log

Column “Time” shows the time required to compute the energy and forces for 1 MD step and 1 atom, which is estimated from a simulation of 10 runs for a structure with 284 atoms using a workstation with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz. Note that the MLPs should be carefully used for extreme structures. The MLPs often return meaningless values for them.

• All Pareto optimal MLPs are available here.